| Participant Observer is the story of how Robin Fox, now one of the most prominent anthropologists of our time, born in England in the Depression, managed against the odds to get to the point described by David Attenborough: at the London School of Economics in the mid-sixties. It goes on to tell how he went on from there to become a pioneer of what Robert Ardrey called “the revolution in the social sciences” - the revolution that, after a hundred years, took Darwin seriously in the study of behavior.
In the autobiographical tradition of Lévi-Strauss’s Tristes Tropiques, but crossed with a good dose of Angela’s Ashes, Fox, acting as the independent narrator of his own life, takes us on an exuberant romp through the thirties to the seventies of last century, over several continents but mainly Europe and America. It is a personal, historical and intellectual journey, which is at once intriguing, hilarious and moving. Without ever mentioning his own name, or any dates, he looks for all the impingements that caused the protean shifts in this sprawling mini-saga of the adventures of a child of the meritocracy.
From the proverbial humble beginnings, in a family whose income was “a shilling a week less than Frank McCourt’s” he became one of those at the center of the great debate of the century: the contention about the nature of human nature in a world that had learned, or failed to learn, from Darwin. But it was a long road, peppered with strange events, brain-bending ideas, odd adventures, dangers and sorrows, loves and losses, and a spectacular cast of lively – often very strange – characters. From Bertrand Russell and Noam Chomsky, to Margaret Mead and Konrad Lorenz, via William Fulbright, Kingsley Amis, and Lionel Tiger, among many, many others. Throughout all this he floats, like Christopher Isherwood’s camera, at once observant and baffled, interested and amazed, sympathetic and cynical, but eternally curious.
He feels he has been the observer of a series of endings: the last gasps of now extinct ways of life. He saw the last of the old steam-powered northern-English wool towns of the industrial revolution; of the pre-industrial Hardy countryside of southern England; of the ancient Grammar Schools before their destruction by doctrinaire socialism; of the old London School of Economics when it was still an international family, not just a big college; of the brave but failed experiment that was Talcott Parsons’ Social Relations Department at Harvard; of the innocent but troubled America of the fifties; of the last gasp of traditional Indian life in New Mexico; of “genteel Jane Austen England” in Devon; of peasant-crofter life in the Gaelic-speaking Irish islands; of the old American rah-rah men’s college at Rutgers and Princeton; of the amateur bullfight in provincial South America; of the intimate and eccentric world of anthropology before its rapid expansion in the seventies; and of the whole “deferential society” wounded in the sixties and seventies, and beginning to be erased by political correctness and egalitarian dumbing down in a world changed utterly by the baby boom, the pill and Vietnam.
Advance praise for Participant Observer:
- “Robin Fox has had a fascinating, adventurous and funny life. It would make a great movie.”
- Peter Cattaneo, director of Academy Award nominee for Best Picture, The Full Monty.
- “Participant Observer is so well written, so high-table picaresque, so obsessively learned (as can only be the product of a British education), so slant, so provocative and skitterish. Who is this remarkable third-person writer pirouetting all around me? An important work stylistically and an important account of a chapter in intellectual history, by a scholar who strides science and the humanities, and who records here the richness of his travels around the borderlands.”
- E. O. Wilson (Harvard University.) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis; On Human Nature; Naturalist; Consilience; Genes. Mind and Culture; The Diversity of Life; The Bio-Philia Hypothesis, etc.
- “A whirlwind ride through the formative years of modern anthropology. Robin Fox has never failed to entertain me.”
- Desmond Morris. The Naked Ape; The Human Zoo; Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior; The Human Animal, etc.
- “An unexpectedly charming, eminently literary and often quite hilarious account and exposé of the intellectual life. Academic departmental insanities, egos run amok, brilliant theories, sexual and romantic (mis)alliances, adventure, ambition, illusion, childhood griefs, all jostle for our attention. If you want to know about some of the greatest ideas of twentieth century social science, and about the culture and era that produced them, this is the book for you. Fox names names; he’s met them all, and he exposes both their genius and their frailties. It is painstakingly recreated, refreshingly scandalous, and a must read for all those who want to understand the ideas that have shaped our world and our perception of it. He turns the thinking life into the grand adventure that it is.”
- Phyllis Chesler. Women and Madness; Patriarchy; Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman; The New Anti-Semitism etc.
-
“A courageous man lives a hundred lives, because he fears none of the branches that the path of life opens up to us. Robin Fox is one of the most courageous men of our times, not in one way, as is usual, but in three: his courage is physical, emotional and intellectual.
He is a great adventurer, a traveler in the tradition of Sir Richard Burton, Merriweather Lewis, and T. E. Lawrence, and his life reads like the best sort of adventure story. He is also a great experiencer – his loves, friendships and personal vicissitudes run the gamut from the tragic, through the richly comic, to the revelatory, seen here with an honesty unusual in a memoirist. Most of all he is one of the intellectual champions of our era. There is scarcely a single major issue in the human sciences in which he has not been embroiled, never taking the politic path, always representing the unpopular side, and uncomfortably right, as it proved, most of the time.
Participant Observer, is a romp at blazing speed and with unfailing wit and verve through the great period of anthropology as it developed from an obscure and marginal field into one of the most influential disciplines in the world. It is full of brilliant portraits of the great actors of that drama, and indeed of many of the leading figures of the last several decades in politics, show business, the arts and the sciences in general. It represents a worldview that we need now more than ever: one that loves the human race in all its self-ignorance, its tragic contradictions, and its foolish hopes.”
- Frederick Turner (U. of Texas – Dallas.) Genesis: An Epic Poem; The New World; Hadean Eclogues; Natural Classicism; Beauty: The Value of Values; Shakespeare’s Twenty-first-Century Economics; The Culture of Hope; Tempest, Flute and Oz, etc.
- “Robin Fox, once young rebel, now eminent explainer of social origins, smiter of chicanery and academic pap, is also a literary man, linguist, poet, singer, artist and adventurer. Friend and precept find him loyal. Fools he suffers suffer from him. He wears emblematic names, and you recognize him. Hideous shapes dance with beauty. Fear pursues glory. Buy it, steal it, keep it safe between the cinnamon and the ginger.”
-
Richard de Mille. My Secret Mother, Lorna Moon; Castaneda’s Journey; The Don Juan Papers; Nail Your Mother to the Ceiling, etc
-
“Robin Fox writes with great charm, directness and wit. His thinking is always independent and original. The unusual idea of combining a history of anthropology with
the anthropologist’s personal memoirs opens unexpected emotional and intellectual
depths.” -
Mary Douglas. Purity and Dange; Natural Symbols; Leviticus as Literature; Implicit Meanings; The World of Goods, etc.
- “Robin Fox was an influential pioneer of what many consider the most important intellectual revolution of our time: the recognition of the inherited parameters of human behavior. He has now written a memoir that deftly blends the nascence of this tectonic shift in the way humans perceive themselves with the way one human sees his own fascinating life. The result is a witty, artfully written autobiography, that is both important in the history of ideas and a joy to read.”
-
William Wright. Lillian Hellman: The Image, The Woman; Pavarotti: My World; The Washington Game; The Von Bulow Affair; Born That Way: Genes, Behavior, Personality, etc.
-
“Robin Fox has written a spirited, poetic, amusing and erudite account of his journey through
life and science. As his thoughtful and adventurous narrative unfolds, you come to
understand the major 20th century ideas and events that have revolutionized the social
sciences and are setting the intellectual trends today. It’s a grand read:
learned and an awful lot of fun.”
-
Helen Fisher. Why We Love; The First Sex; The Anatomy of Love; The Sex Contract.
- “Participant Observer describes a fascinating intellectual odyssey that occurred over the second half of the twentieth century. It is both a commentary on a career, from precocious schoolboy to distinguished academician and, equally, an interpretation of the significant changes in the development of the social sciences during the period. He evokes forceful memories of English university life as it was poised to be transformed from an elite to a mass system of tertiary education. This is contrasted with the USA and Harvard and Rutgers, where he spent most of his career. It is a celebration of the interconnectedness between thought and action.”
- Lord Smith of Clifton, former Vice-chancellor, The University of Ulster.
- “Robin Fox, citing Hume, says that the very idea of ‘self’ is a colossal act of faith. This faith is amply justified in Fox’s case. His account of his long, rich life is gracefully crafted, consistently interesting, frequently funny, and all in all a pleasure to read. Since it has been a life of the mind, it is also a lively history of the ideas and events of the mid-to-late twentieth century. It will interest anyone who wants to understand the modern transformation of the social sciences by biology.”
-
Melvin Konner (Emory University).The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit; Becoming a Doctor; Why the Reckless Survive, and Other Secrets of Human Nature; The Paleolithic Prescription.
|
| OUTLINE
Part One: Stages in a Life
Ch 1. The Child: Dancing for the Woolworth Ladies
He takes us from the original, archetypal, Woolworth Ladies, selling broken loose biscuits during the depression years, in the Yorkshire dales . Having barely survived at birth, he appears on a newsreel, then wanders through the England of WWII, has a narrow escape from death, and finds sanctuary with the soldiers (including the Americans.) There follows education in the Church of England (a passion for the Anglican funeral service, and rote learning for Sunday School prizes), a mystical religious epiphany in the church choirstalls, another near death experience, and the keen desire to become a vicar in order to escape the inevitable flames of hell. This all leads to a surprise scholarship to an ancient Grammar School in the Brontë birthplace. (The Brontës haunt his life and imagination, especially the failure, Branwell.)
Ch. 2. The Boy: Making it to the Next Foxhole
He remembers in amazing and funny detail his years as a schoolboy, and writes a loving hymn of praise to these now-abolished Grammar Schools, whose cricketing code of morals was about the best guide to decent behavior available to young boys, or ex-colonial peoples for that matter. He was only interested in music and sports, sang in a record number of Messiahs, and played illegal amateur rugby league. He played truant in order to read what he liked (in the Bradford covered market where he lived on pork pies and chain-drank mugs of tea.)
Ch. 3. The Youth: Coming in on Roller Skates
He suffered a sudden religious de-conversion, and obsessed with the desire to become a journalist immediately, he almost blew his chances for any educational advancement. Injury (fortunately) cut short his rugby career. He was rescued by kind but tough teachers, and ended up, after discovering Catholic girls, ballroom dancing, Conservative politics, Rationalism, Bertrand Russell, Sir James Frazer (via T.S. Eliot and the Unitarian Church), the theater, Existentialism, Economics and jazz, with yet another scholarship, this time to the London School of Economics.
Ch. 4. The Student: Putting on the Masks
His years at the LSE are described with nostalgic affection, dominated by London jazz bands (Lonnie Donnegan and skiffle – the origin of the Beatles) and student politics (including a debate in support of Enoch Powell.) He veers between the Logical Positivism of A. J. Ayer, the methodology of Karl Popper, Functionalist Anthropology, quarrels with the local Marxists, student reviews, student journalism, the Spanish guitar (via John Williams) verse drama, tentative sex, and beer. The Suez crisis saw him clubbed by the police, carried into the House of Commons, and disillusioned with the Conservative Party. He got married, and escaped the draft via another scholarship, this time to Harvard, although this was only because the Philosophy department at Cornell reneged.
Ch. 5. The Novice: Mixing with the Yeast Enzymes
The Harvard of the fifties and the Social Relations Department proved bewildering but exhilarating, with strange professors, multiple requirements and odd doctrines, including the pervading Freudianism. The ambience of this now extinct experiment conducted by Talcott Parsons is meticulously recreated. It includes the influence of B.F. Skinner and Behaviorism, cognitive dissonance, culture and personality, and interaction process analysis, along with a passion for American food (the Howard Johnson student 99 cent lunch figures here), a visit from Fidel Castro, lunches with James B. Watson, and cocktails with JFK.
Ch. 6. The Initiate: Journeying Through Wonderland
The pace was punishing, but he was rescued from total despair by the science of Linguistics, and took to it with the passion of a convert, including the early words of the young Noam Chomsky at MIT. This led to a chance to do fieldwork in New Mexico and a trip in an old Ford through the wonderland of the USA via ‘occupied Arkansas,’ the bug infested Texas panhandle, and the ‘great wall’ of the Rockies, to the Pueblo of Cochiti on the Rio Grande. Life with the Indians, studying their kinship, ritual and language, and being cured of dysentery by the medicine men (and harassed by the Santa Fe hospital bureaucracy), leads to trips to all over the Southwest, and a growing conviction that he perhaps might just make an anthropologist after all. Returning to Harvard he teams up with John Whiting at the Laboratory of Social Development and learns the cross-cultural method while developing ideas about the incest taboo. A job offer from the University of Exeter sends him reeling back to England, again unprepared, and uncertain just what he is doing.
Ch. 7. The Apprentice: Letting the Soul Catch Up
Exeter, the last outpost of ‘genteel Jane Austen England’ sees him with a frantic teaching load, a running argument with the New Left Review Study Group, an entry into Liberal politics, cricket with the faculty team (average age 55), the founding of the weekly New Society, and the influence of John Bowlby who tells him about ‘Ethology’ and is excited by his theory that the mother-child bond, not the nuclear family, is the basic unit of kinship. But all is eclipsed by a chance visit, while looking for Gaelic speakers to study bilingualism, to Tory Island in Donegal. The Tory Islanders, with their King, their clans, and their custom of not living together on marriage, become his next obsession, along with the birth of two daughters. He publishes a seminal paper on ‘Sibling Incest’ (involving a ‘law of incest avoidance’) and is invited by Raymond Firth to join the Social Anthropology department at the LSE.
Ch. 8. The Idea: Challenging the Dominant Males
Back in his old haunt, and established, somewhat to his alarm, as an ‘expert’ on the incest taboo, he is given a graduate student to supervise called David Attenborough and ends up becoming a member of the London Zoo and Desmond Morris’s seminar there. Firth makes him lecture on kinship (he wanted to do linguistics) and some students show their notes to a Penguin Books editor, who signs him up to write a book. He writes a thesis on Cochiti (examined by Edmund Leach), has a third daughter, reads Robert Ardrey’s African Genesis and has another conversion experience, joins Morris’s team producing the BBC’s Life program, and copes with Derek Freeman’s distaste for Margaret Mead.
After helping with the first issue of Penthouse, he meets Lionel Tiger studying male bonding at the Zoo, and they write a paper on ‘The Zoological Perspective in Social Science.’ Bill Hamilton explains the genetics of altruism to him on the steps of the Albert Memorial. His kinship lectures become Kinship and Marriage, he takes Lévi-Strauss for a beer, and his thesis is slated for publication. He gets too deeply involved in the student ‘troubles’ at the LSE leading to an all out fight with the authorities, and midnight journeys in the rain looking for Jo Grimond to be a mediator. In the midst of another fit of disillusionment, he has an offer of a chair of Anthropology from a brand new college at Rutgers University in New Jersey, which he accepts after they agree to hire Tiger as well.
Ch. 9. The Career: Telling God Your Plans
Once again dangerously under informed, he lands in the middle of the Newark riots and finds that what was to become ‘the MIT of the social sciences’ is turning into an attempt at instant social reform. He sees the last of the old men’s college campus morph into the co-ed dorms, long hair and psychedelic/radical culture, and the corruption of everything by the Vietnam War. He is trapped with a Dean who is ‘veridically challenged’ and colleagues with radical agendas. He likes college football. He meets E. O. Wilson, and Joe Alsop, writes for the New York Times, interviews Margaret Mead, and gives evidence at a presidential commission. He delivers ‘The Cultural Animal’ as a lecture, and the response makes him realize he has walked into an intellectual minefield. He goes to California (Stanford and Berkeley), studies brains and mixes with hippies.
Ch. 10. The Book: Engaging the Living Fossils
He and Tiger begin to write a book, which comes out as The Imperial Animal and gets them a lot of popular attention and a lot more academic attacks and feminist vitriol. They are condemned by the Ruth Benedict Collective in New York, heckled by Trotskyites and transvestites on BBC television, and caught up in a drunken singsong in Soho with Kingsley Amis.
The ex-president of Rutgers, Mason Gross, invites them to become research directors of the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, where they begin to have a real impact by supporting young pioneers of the Biosocial movement. Divorce, re-marriage and the attempt to find somewhere where his daughters can live free from asthma, takes him to Oxford for a year – but before that the book moves into ‘short story mode.’
Part Two: Scenes from a Life
Chs. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
The Dances: Communing with Strange Gods
The Man: Outwitting the British
The Hetaerae: Surviving Sex in the Seventies
The Bulls: Managing a Magus in Columbia
The Meals: Eating Well while Thinking Big
The stories involve first a tale of unreal wandering through a series of Indian dances – Navaho, Hopi, Zuni, Santo Domingo, ending with a psychedelic nightmare induced by peyote at Taos. Then there is a run in with the IRA in Donegal (smuggling a gunman past the British), with side visits to the Tory King in a Wexford jail, and a commissioner in Dublin with a strange theory of Irish surnames. Then a participation in a provincial bullfight in Colombia – another near disaster, with multilingual debates among politicians about who owns utopia. Then a series of memorable meals, in Paris, Israel, Rome and the Stockholm Opera House, where the ‘dynamic duo’ come close to bankrupting several foundations. Then there is an account in dialogue of a series of encounters with ‘the hetaerae’ – the new sexually liberated women on the loose at conferences: his colleagues whom he mistakes for expensive hookers.
Part Three: Reflections on a Life
Ch. 16 The Point: Connecting with the Teenage Murderer
The year of reflection at Oxford – his fortieth, shows himself, society and the intellectual world at one of those turning points where a new cultural order is taking shape. The world of the Woolworth Ladies he grew up with is not going to be the world of the future. He ruminates on violence, and how ideas are more dangerous than instincts. He ponders the origins of mind and society, and how the evolution of incest inhibitions might help explain both. He redefines instinct in the hope of solving the nature/nurture problem. He fends off advances from the dons, and puts together a book on Biosocial Anthropology. He visits his children in the Alps, completes his book on the Tory Islanders, tells Ed. Wilson not to write the final chapter of Sociobiology, and survives – during the Tour de France - a bombing attack on a Basque cycle team by mysterious assailants linked to Franco. There it appropriately ends.
top
SUMMARY
There is no heavy hand of ‘research’ here; the story is told as it unfolds in his memory, which is capacious and detailed, but pointed and accurate, if a little hazy on chronology. Every page either raises a laugh, provokes a thought, or taps the emotions. It is always human, sometimes sad, sometimes ridiculous, sometimes hilarious, but never less than interesting.
It is a kind of Cook’s Tour through the ideas and intellectual movements of mid-century, when the world changed and the foundations of the twenty-first century were set. It is the history of an education by a narrator in love with learning. Anyone who has had an education will be entranced, for the process has never been described like this before. To go on the author’s personal roller coaster ride (which he describes as 'fact loosely based on fiction') through this turbulent time is to understand better what we came from and where we are heading, but never in the process to be preached at. One reader described it as ‘the thinking man’s Angela’s Ashes’ – except that it is a lot more believable, a lot more informative, and a lot funnier.
Robin Fox has received many accolades for his previous writing (thirteen books to date.) The New Yorker praised Encounter with Anthropology for its "sympathy, wit, learning and acumen." The New York Times Book Review said his essays in The Challenge of Anthropology were "erudite, witty, irreverent, creative, cryptic at times, challenging all the time, and free of academic cant." The Chicago Sun-Times praised his writing in The Red Lamp of Incest for its "effortless elegance and charm." Iris Murdoch called The Violent Imagination, "a free, wild book… a beautiful, strange work." Ashley Montagu praised the same work for its "wit, humor, learning and insight." The Saturday Review said The Imperial Animal was "one of the most creative contributions to the social science literature. It is also superlative writing… an impressive tour de force." Napoleon Chagnon said Fox was "rapidly becoming the conscience of anthropology." The poet and critic Fred Turner said The Passionate Mind was "A book bursting with wit, courage, panache, brilliance and defiant originality." The American Anthropologist praised his essays as "witty, sarcastic, large minded, philosophically informed, inventive." John Mella, the editor of Light, said his poetry "recalls Auden at his best." Kurt Vonnegut says: "You write like an angel." His first book, Kinship and Marriage, is still in print in more than a dozen languages, thirty-six years after publication, and remains the most widely read anthropology text in the world.
top
|